<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for AppliedUsers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://appliedusers.ca/blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://appliedusers.ca/blog</link>
	<description>Knowledge shared is knowledge gained...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:37:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Service Outage by Andy</title>
		<link>http://appliedusers.ca/blog/?p=515&#038;cpage=1#comment-2892</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appliedusers.ca/blog/?p=515#comment-2892</guid>
		<description>Shift + delete will vet those files.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shift + delete will vet those files.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Service Outage by Jan Regnier</title>
		<link>http://appliedusers.ca/blog/?p=515&#038;cpage=1#comment-2886</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Regnier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appliedusers.ca/blog/?p=515#comment-2886</guid>
		<description>Agree with Mark....no worries...you do a fantastic job and we appreciate it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with Mark&#8230;.no worries&#8230;you do a fantastic job and we appreciate it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Service Outage by Mark</title>
		<link>http://appliedusers.ca/blog/?p=515&#038;cpage=1#comment-2885</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appliedusers.ca/blog/?p=515#comment-2885</guid>
		<description>No worries -- we appreciate what you do!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No worries &#8212; we appreciate what you do!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on TAM Clntfile.exe errors by Michael J. Youndt</title>
		<link>http://appliedusers.ca/blog/?p=18&#038;cpage=1#comment-2676</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael J. Youndt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 21:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appliedusers.ca/blog/?p=18#comment-2676</guid>
		<description>I am an IT consultant and have a client that I have helped upgrade servers and PCs over the years. I have no direct familiarity with WinTAM but ever since an upgrade to Win 2008 server I am getting lots of these errors that cause loss of network connectivity. Very aggrivating and I am getting a lot of resistance from AppSystems finding a solution. I have spent days worth of time (not charging) my client to eliminate network issues, which AppSystems wants to blame. I have run out of ideas and at a complete loss where to go from here. I just happened to find this blog post and could really, really use some help from anywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am an IT consultant and have a client that I have helped upgrade servers and PCs over the years. I have no direct familiarity with WinTAM but ever since an upgrade to Win 2008 server I am getting lots of these errors that cause loss of network connectivity. Very aggrivating and I am getting a lot of resistance from AppSystems finding a solution. I have spent days worth of time (not charging) my client to eliminate network issues, which AppSystems wants to blame. I have run out of ideas and at a complete loss where to go from here. I just happened to find this blog post and could really, really use some help from anywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why SORBS sucks. by Trog</title>
		<link>http://appliedusers.ca/blog/?p=119&#038;cpage=1#comment-2000</link>
		<dc:creator>Trog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 07:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appliedusers.ca/blog/?p=119#comment-2000</guid>
		<description>I really wish someone could explain to be how a &quot;service&quot; like SORBS is considered legitimate.  It was a knee-jerk reaction to the escalating spam problem and rather than do something intelligent, orgs flocked to outfits like SORBS because their over-worked, undertrained IT staff took the &quot;I don&#039;t have time to actually fix the problem&quot; approach to spam.  I can&#039;t wish enough horrible things to happen to this blight of a &quot;service&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really wish someone could explain to be how a &#8220;service&#8221; like SORBS is considered legitimate.  It was a knee-jerk reaction to the escalating spam problem and rather than do something intelligent, orgs flocked to outfits like SORBS because their over-worked, undertrained IT staff took the &#8220;I don&#8217;t have time to actually fix the problem&#8221; approach to spam.  I can&#8217;t wish enough horrible things to happen to this blight of a &#8220;service&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why SORBS sucks. by mdt</title>
		<link>http://appliedusers.ca/blog/?p=119&#038;cpage=1#comment-1517</link>
		<dc:creator>mdt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2011 23:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appliedusers.ca/blog/?p=119#comment-1517</guid>
		<description>They&#039;re even blocking Gmail.
&quot;550 550 5.2.1 Mailbox unavailable. Your IP address 74.125.82.52 is blacklisted using SORBS-ALL. Details: Currently Sending Spam See:http://www.sorbs.net/lookup.shtml?74.125.82.52. (state 17).&quot;
Wow. Real reliable outfit there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re even blocking Gmail.</p>
<p>&#8220;550 550 5.2.1 Mailbox unavailable. Your IP address 74.125.82.52 is blacklisted using SORBS-ALL. Details: Currently Sending Spam See:<a href="http://www.sorbs.net/lookup.shtml?74.125.82.52" rel="nofollow">http://www.sorbs.net/lookup.shtml?74.125.82.52</a>. (state 17).&#8221;</p>
<p>Wow. Real reliable outfit there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Making the Web Work for You &#8211; Part 4 by Ed Roach</title>
		<link>http://appliedusers.ca/blog/?p=125&#038;cpage=1#comment-684</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Roach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 01:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appliedusers.ca/blog/?p=125#comment-684</guid>
		<description>For me blogging has gotten me business all over the world. Most recently a month long branding project in Tanzania. It is a great way to build your expert profile, and build confidence. I also get publicity and interviews. If you&#039;re a business person and you&#039;re not considering blogging for business, them I suggest you put it on your radar. It works for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me blogging has gotten me business all over the world. Most recently a month long branding project in Tanzania. It is a great way to build your expert profile, and build confidence. I also get publicity and interviews. If you&#8217;re a business person and you&#8217;re not considering blogging for business, them I suggest you put it on your radar. It works for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why SORBS sucks. by Rickc</title>
		<link>http://appliedusers.ca/blog/?p=119&#038;cpage=1#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>Rickc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 23:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appliedusers.ca/blog/?p=119#comment-171</guid>
		<description>Sounds like they were being DDoS&#039;d today - sucks to be them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like they were being DDoS&#8217;d today &#8211; sucks to be them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why SORBS sucks. by Rickc</title>
		<link>http://appliedusers.ca/blog/?p=119&#038;cpage=1#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>Rickc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 20:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appliedusers.ca/blog/?p=119#comment-170</guid>
		<description>how ironic - the SORBS registration email went straight to my GMail spam folder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how ironic &#8211; the SORBS registration email went straight to my GMail spam folder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why SORBS sucks. by Rickc</title>
		<link>http://appliedusers.ca/blog/?p=119&#038;cpage=1#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>Rickc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 17:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appliedusers.ca/blog/?p=119#comment-169</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment Chuck.  I do disagree with the attempt to create a revenue stream by charging for de-listing, but I also find UCE-Protect Level 1 BL to be useful.   Those who run DNSBLs do need some method of financially supporting their efforts without extorting those who get listed - legitimately or otherwise.  I have not dealt with UCE-Protect for a listed IP, but I have dealt with their backscatter.org list.  It was our fault though, because we were sending out NDRs likely crazy, but getting de-listed was no picnic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment Chuck.  I do disagree with the attempt to create a revenue stream by charging for de-listing, but I also find UCE-Protect Level 1 BL to be useful.   Those who run DNSBLs do need some method of financially supporting their efforts without extorting those who get listed &#8211; legitimately or otherwise.  I have not dealt with UCE-Protect for a listed IP, but I have dealt with their backscatter.org list.  It was our fault though, because we were sending out NDRs likely crazy, but getting de-listed was no picnic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

